At the beginning, the silence, the white paper. Only then is the original part. formed by the disintegration of opposites in a sentence Division and thus revitalize the silent, empty world. All at once it is filled with consciousness, which is always consciousness of something. With each sentence below the division continues to advance, the language acquisition of the elusive world of small-scale, more concrete. The concepts come from each other From explain each other. At infinity come full circle from the networking of infinitely many sentences, the new world is emerging. Something like that is put before Hölderlin the relationship between language and world. A utopia of the possible correlation between language and world as infinite approximation by the constant formation of sentences. The Utopia of advancing linguistic precision in the production of text.
precision of the extent to which these conceptual linkages has something to do with the non-linear world, is in all attempts to bridge the gap unexplained. The pragmatist solve the Gordian problem: Of course there is the world. We go every day in our rates assume that the words corresponding to something ("and then you have to turn left at the traffic light ..."). The pessimists maintain life in the cell: The beetles stay in their conceptual boxes for itself, we in our consciousness cage alone forever. All the rest are misunderstandings in foreign languages. Successful communication is unlikely. And what is success? That one at the Traffic light, turn left at the end? That each understands subtext of what is meant? That one mitrealisiert the socio-cultural backgrounds in understanding the speaker? Ironic that you recognize speech? Nothing but uncertainties. But without the unsafe bridge the language, do not consume from clear information, but by the ever-lasting uncertainty, the world would remain silent, the paper white.
As a means of mapping is not good language. Each set proposes an arbitrary path in the visible world. It will be the loser that could not be said or could also look at the same description different. Description does not replace a picture, no scenario. There remains a gap, that blur which allows the reader to think rather than the relationship that should be represented, what he wants to read it. But the imagination has little to do with the visible. The experiences at trying to create a script.
0 comments:
Post a Comment